Nick Smith MP

Working for you in Blaenau Gwent

Home

Recent Activity

Nick Smith MP has called on the Government to keep the valleys region moving as the future of EU-funded projects remains unclear.

Mr Smith has been asking in Parliament for the Government to financially support Blaenau Gwent and neighbouring boroughs, who have been aided for years by EU grants and capital investment.

On the request of Chancellor George Osborne, Mr Smith has written to the Treasury team making the case for the Government to back vital infrastructure projects across South East Wales.

These include the further developments to the Heads of the Valleys road and the proposed South Wales metro system – both of which are currently underpinned by EU funding.

Speaking after the Treasury questions session in Parliament, Mr Smith said the Brexit negotiations will be vital for Blaenau Gwent’s future for years to come.

“It’s the Government’s job to ensure we now get the best deal possible in the wake of Brexit”, he said.

“However, they must resist the temptation to funnel funding to the same old areas, the big city projects or the areas rich with Tory voters.

“I don’t want to see support for Blaenau Gwent dropping from the tens of millions to the tens of thousands and I think however you voted, we can all agree on that.

“I disagree with the Chancellor on a whole host of policies, but I hope his willingness to listen is a sliver of hope for the time ahead.

“We won’t forget it in this borough if we are abandoned. The Government must extend the same helping hand that the EU gladly offered for so long.”

A copy of the letter is below:

Dear Chancellor,

I am writing to you to follow up your offer in the commons chamber to detail proposals for the Government’s future infrastructure investment. Thank you for your positive and constructive response to these important questions.

I know you support the electrification of the valleys lines and have noted the city region metro, but with the detail still to be worked through on Brexit, future investment in these key infrastructure projects is unclear.

The South Wales Metro and the continued improvements to the Heads of the Valleys road past the Merthyr Tydfil area in South East Wales are of vital importance. They are projects that will be shovel ready, which will not only create jobs in their construction, but also will provide the links needed for business to thrive in my area. They are established plans that have received Welsh government, cross-party and business support.

However, both of these projects have EU funding at their core. The doubt that surrounds these projects is very real and my fear is that Blaenau Gwent and neighbouring boroughs will be left behind as everyone begins to fight for funding.

There will be many good projects that were to have received EU support which may now be stymied. I am sure they will all be brought to the attention of the Treasury for the future.

But given the special needs for economic regeneration in South East Wales I would be grateful if you could consider these points and back these projects financially.  They are projects that promise to boost the economy in an area that needs boosting much more than most.

Yours sincerely,

Nick Smith MP

"The Government must keep the Valleys moving"

Nick Smith MP has called on the Government to keep the valleys region moving as the future of EU-funded projects remains unclear. Mr Smith has been asking in Parliament for...

Nick Smith MP has called for answers from the Government in a bid to protect the future of a post-Brexit Blaenau Gwent.

Mr Smith has challenged both the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Secretary of State for Transport as Parliament reformed to deal with the implications of the EU referendum result.

Speaking at Treasury Questions, Mr Smith pointed out the importance of European Union funds for development in Blaenau Gwent and asked what measures were being taken for that support to continue – a situation described by George Osborne in response as a “challenging question”.

Then at Transport Questions Mr Smith argued for the importance of the mooted South Wales metro system, a plan requiring millions of EU money.  However, the Minister could not name any action they would be taking to protect the project.

Speaking after the sessions, Mr Smith said with his borough receiving more money from the EU than it put in, it was vital to defend the levels of support needed to make improvements.

“I campaigned in a borough where our new road systems, hospital, schooling and town landscapes were all dependent on EU funding”, he said.

“I think whatever side of the debate you fell on, we can all agree it is now vial to champion the good that funding did and fight for equal or better support in the years ahead.

“Everyone is going to be clamouring for a piece of the pie while there is so much uncertainty over the future of the country. I would not want Blaenau Gwent to be left behind while the money is funnelled to richer areas like the South East of England.

“I’ll be making our voice heard, as I am sure will many of my Valleys colleagues.”

Please find the questions asked in Parliament this week and the responses below

1)      Nick Smith: European Union funds have helped economic development in my constituency. What measures is the Chancellor going to take to ensure that areas such as south Wales continue to receive support for infrastructure and to help to boost jobs in our valleys?

George Osborne Chancellor of the Exchequer and First Secretary of State: We are going to face some big questions about providing support to the institutions, regions and sectors that have been receiving European Union assistance, most notably the regional support that has been provided to areas such as south Wales, the ongoing support that the EU provides for research in our universities and the support for our farming community. We in the House of Commons are going to have to address all those issues in the coming months and possibly beyond. However, at the moment we remain a member of the European Union—I shall talk about the procedure for our departure in a moment—and the European funding and grants will continue to be made. We are looking specifically at areas where questions have been asked about long-term uncertainty in relation to particular projects, and I will keep the House updated. This is a challenging question, which we have to answer, and we are looking at it very intensively now. But at the moment nothing has changed and we remain a member of the European Union.

That brings me back to the question of trying to resolve as quickly as is practical the uncertainty about the new relationship we are seeking with the European Union and our European neighbours. We need a bit of realism and we need to offer reassurance. It is apparent that the uncertainty will be fully resolved only when we as a country have negotiated an agreement with our European partners on the relationship we now want to have with them. We know what the broad options are. The Government spelled them out and set out the different relationship models over the past few months in the Treasury and Cabinet Office papers that were produced in advance of the referendum. We could join the European economic area, like Norway; we could forge a new negotiated bilateral agreement with the EU, like Canada; we could adopt the Swiss model; or we could rely on World Trade Organisation rules.

As the Prime Minister set out at this Dispatch Box, the Government have established a new unit at the heart of Government made up of some of the best civil servants, reporting to the Cabinet, that will help us as we make that decision. I stress, however, that Members of Parliament and other organisations can feed in to the work that is taking place, so that we have the fullest possible information on the decision that we will have to take collectively as a Parliament on our new relationship with Europe.

My view is clear that we should move towards an arrangement that provides us with the closest possible economic ties with our European neighbours. Close to half of our exports go to the EU and millions of jobs are supported by our trade with the EU. Leading industries, such as car manufacturing, farming and our services industry, are reliant on that relationship, and we should be moving towards an arrangement under which—if we reach it and can negotiate it—the trade of both goods and services, including financial services, is as free as possible. In the meantime, returning to a point I made earlier, UK firms continue to have exactly the same status as any other EU firm. Business continues in the City and elsewhere, including for euro-denominated trading in our financial markets.

However, I am a realist—we have to be realistic about this—and we must acknowledge that we cannot have all the benefits of the EU without accepting any of the costs and obligations. It will be for this Parliament to decide what the accommodations and compromises should be.

2)      Nick Smith: A new metro system in south Wales would really help rail tourism there, but the planned metro is heavily dependent on EU support. What measures will theMinister take to ensure that the south Wales valleys metro system can be delivered?

Claire Perry Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport): Investment in rail services in Wales is now devolved to the Welsh Administration, so that funding is a matter for them. I am sure that, like me, the hon. Gentleman will welcome the fact that three of the winners of the competitions I mentioned were based in Wales, including the wonderful velorail bike visitor attraction, which involves cycling along disused railways on enormous great bicycles. There will be some tourism uplift from investments like those.

Support for Blaenau Gwent after Brexit

Nick Smith MP has called for answers from the Government in a bid to protect the future of a post-Brexit Blaenau Gwent. Mr Smith has challenged both the Chancellor of...

NICK Smith MP is calling for the Government to back British in their canteens after their poor food record was revealed.

The Shadow Farming Minister had previously criticised DEFRA for promoting their Great British Food campaign while importing nearly half the food for their Department.

 

Now after a latest series of questions across departments revealed a similar story across the board, Mr Smith called on the Government to do their bit in supporting British.

While the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills were able to demonstrate a food record of 75% British, the performance was far poorer at DECC (48%), the DWP (42%) and CLG (34%).

When taking out their figures for meat and dairy the Foreign and Commonwealth Office dipped to 35%, while the Home Office, Defence, Transport and Justice refused to provide data as it could only be obtained at a “disproportionate cost”.

The Treasury and DfID failed to disclose their record in their responses.

Speaking after the results were published, Mr Smith said the Government needed to take a good hard look at how they support British produce – and DEFRA should be leading the way.

“DEFRA have trumpeted Great British Food while being all too content to look elsewhere to feed themselves.

“Now we see several other departments doing even worse. If the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills can hit 75%, why can’t everyone else?

“The Secretary of State for DEFRA should take a break from her jet-setting trade missions around the globe and get Great British Food on the agenda at the next cabinet meeting.

“I’m particularly concerned that the Ministry of Defence failed to respond.

“They supplied this information in 2013 and three years later they’re dodging the question. It looks bad for them.”

Nick’s question to Governmental departments was as follows - To ask what the annual budget is for food produced for their Department's offices; and what proportion of food produced for their Department was sourced from British producers in the last period for which figures are available.

A full copy of all answers can be found at http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-questions-answers/?page=1&max=20&questiontype=AllQuestions&house=commons%2clords&member=3928&keywords=british

The Ministry of Defence responded to a question from Huw Irranca-Davies MP on July 15, 2013. The question and response can be found at http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2013-07-15a.164762.h&s=food+defence+british+speaker%3A11347#g164762.q0

Government canteens failing to back British food

NICK Smith MP is calling for the Government to back British in their canteens after their poor food record was revealed. The Shadow Farming Minister had previously criticised DEFRA for...


View More Activities

The Labour Party will place cookies on your computer to help us make this website better.

Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site.

To find out more about these cookies, see our privacy notice. Use of this site confirms your acceptance of these cookies.